domenica 31 maggio 2026

Unitarian Universalism and ministerial succession

In the last months I've been watching and transcribing some dozens of Unitarian Universalist ordination prayers/invocations and laying on of hands, and also I've found other descriptive material


My research is not 'scientific', because I started searching specifically Christian Unitarian ordination prayer and then I expanded my accumulation of data. 


And I noticed a phenomena: the cohabitation of two different theologies and practices: the congreational and the successionist.


The first one could be called rightly the 'congregational perspective': it consider the ordination mainly as an 'election', the choice of a congregation to recognize a person as a minister. As Susan LaMar put bluntly is his landmark article, the UU traditions stem from the congregational tradition, that denied the doctrine of apostolic succession in a favor of a democratic one centered on recognition of character and election to service by a community.

This theory often border with who consider ordination only as a 'union card' that permit the wider UU community to recognize that a person is apt to act as a 'teacher', having acquired necessary knowledge.



Ritually, it manifest in declaration before the laying of hands or the ordination declaration as 'The authority to confer ordination lies wholly within each congregation and not within any hierarchical power structure [...] congregational communities come together to recognize one among us who has answered the call to ministry as their life's work' ( Ordination of Rev. Emma L. Peterson, April 2, 2023) or a more common or generic 'the authority to ordain a minister rests solely with the congregation' (taken from the UUA bylaws).

There are also explicit affermations during ordination service that deny anything similar to 'apostolic succession': for example rev. Lavanhar in the ordination of Ren Pasco (May 22, 2021) said:

 In the years past, the laying on of the hands was like apostolic succession: someone who laid hands on Saint Peter who was laid hands on Jesus (sic) and it went down through the line; in our tradition, we all are laying hands on you [...]


In contrast to all this affirmation, mention to ministerial succession and continuity pop up often: some example could be the introduction to the laying on of ands by the rev John Buherens (former UUA president) at the ordination of Lyssa Jenkens


You can feel the weight of your colleagues. You stand upon the shoulders of many generations of progressive ministers who have given their lives and their hearts to bring humanity out of its darkness and into its possibilities. Feel this. Feel this history of your colleagues, as you are about to enter this sacred, sacred journey of ministry.




and probably the fact that in this service the ministers were the first to lay hands and the the others through them only reinforced the sense of 'ministerial continuity'.

But many services are not so extreme in this practice, sticking to this order of people who join hands: family and friends of the ordinand, ministers, members of the ordaining congragation(s) and then any other person. This particular order have the role to show from where the 'call' of a minister emerge: his intimate connections, other ministers and the wider UU community. Many times the minister who lead the laying on of hands mention the ordaining power of the community, the Spirit or the energy that flow from the people to the ordinand.

But still I continue to see many reference to ministerial succession and the role of minister in the continuity of the UU movement. This had creeped even in the UUA Ordination and Installation Handbook (page 52), that literally say that the 'laying on of hands' could signify ' [...] the succession of ministers who have come before them.'This expression was used in at least one ordination service.



How to interpret this tension between ?
As rev. Adam Robersmith said in his 2013 paper, Unitarian Universalism is still in infancy and need to develop and his theological center.
Also the influence of other religious group with an history of tradition and trasmission had a role, and also the need for the UU clergy to self-identify as the keeper and custodians of their movement, as a sort of glue in a higly diversified religious group.

Sources

Susan G. LaMr; Unitarian Universalist Ordination: a search for meaning https://uuma.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/A_Unitarian_Universalist_Ordination_-_-_A_Search_for_Meaning.pdf

 09.19.15 Service of Ordination of Lyssa Jenkens to the Unitarian Universalist Ministry  https://youtu.be/cW6Zw-loh0A?si=yLR6sV1aydYIV8EG



The Ordination of Rev. Emma L. Peterson  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO4auF70pg4

Unitarian Universalism and ministerial succession

In the last months I've been watching and transcribing some dozens of Unitarian Universalist ordination prayers/invocations and laying o...